Choosing suitable earmuffs is crucial for safety and performance as a shooter or tactical user. However, with so many options on the market, knowing which one is best suited for your needs can be overwhelming. That’s where we come in.
In this article, we will compare two top tactical earmuff models: the Safariland Liberator and the Sordin Supreme Pro, both the base and advanced models. From hearing protection to compatibility, performance, Ergonomics and Accessories, break down all the factors you must consider before purchasing.
So whether you’re a law enforcement officer, military personnel, or an avid shooter, read on to find out which earmuffs will give you the edge in the field.
In This Article:
- Safariland Liberator vs Sordin Supreme
- Safariland Liberator HP 2.0 vs Sordin Supreme X Pro
- Safariland Liberator V Dual Comm Headset vs Sordin Supreme MIL CC Slim Headset
- Sordin Supreme Pro vs Safariland Liberator
Safariland Liberator vs Sordin Supreme
These are two great brands in the tactical hearing protection industry. They provide advanced features over and above regular electronic muffs.
For this article, we’ll be comparing two sets, the base model and the advanced comms models.
- Safariland Liberator HP 2.0 vs Sordin Supreme X Pro
- Safariland Liberator V Advanced Dual Comm Headset with PTT vs Sordin Supreme MIL CC Slim Comm Headset
When comparing the two sets of earmuffs for tactical purposes, the factors we’ve chosen to go over are;
Noise reduction rating (NRR): The NRR measures how much the earmuffs reduce noise. A higher NRR generally means better protection from loud noises.
Compatibility: The earmuffs should be compatible with the communication devices used by the wearer. For example, they should work with radios or other communication equipment.
Communication capabilities: The earmuffs should have good communication capabilities, such as a built-in microphone and speaker and the ability to connect to communication equipment.
Comfort: The earmuffs should be comfortable to wear for long periods, with features such as soft ear cushions and an adjustable headband.
Durability: The earmuffs should be durable and able to withstand the rigors of tactical use, such as exposure to dust, moisture, and impact.
Safariland Liberator HP 2.0 vs Sordin Supreme X Pro
The Safariland Liberator HP 2.0 earmuffs and the Sordin Supreme Pro X earmuffs are both highly-rated electronic hearing protection devices. However, there are some notable differences between the two that may affect which is better for individual users.
Read the Sordin Supreme Review here.
Both earmuffs have similar levels of sound attenuation, with up to 29 dBa for the Liberator HP 2.0 and up to 25 dBa for the Sordin Supreme Pro X. However, the Liberator HP 2.0 also has active noise cancelation and digital threat compression technology.
One of the key differences between the two earmuffs is the attachment method. The Liberator HP 2.0 has a helmet rail mount, while the Sordin Supreme Pro X earmuffs do not. This makes the Liberator HP 2.0 a good option for those requiring head and ear protection.
The HP 2.0 does not have an AUX port, whereas the Sordins have an AUX port to plug in your device to listen to music and phone calls through the earcups. Neither base model can communicate via the earmuffs, but they both feature active noise cancellation and amplification to hear conversations.
Comfort & Fit
Regarding comfort, the Sordin Supreme Pro X earmuffs have been noted to have a better cheek weld, but the thin form factor can make battery insertion and replacement a bit tricky. On the other hand, the Liberator HP 2.0 has glass polymer injection-molded ear cups that provide excellent durability and advanced sound localization for maximum situational awareness.
|Top||Safariland Impulse Range Kit - Foam Impulse Corded Earplugs with Compact Earmuffs + HD Flex Eyewear Safety Shooting Glasses||Check Prices|
|Top||Safariland Pro Impulse Earplugs - Tactical Filter for Shooting Noises that allows ambient sounds||Check Prices|
|Top||Sordin Supreme PRO X - Active Noise-Canceling Ear Muffs with Gel Seals - Black||Check Prices|
|Top||Sordin Supreme Pro X Camo w/ LED - Safety Ear Muffs with Gel Seals||Check Prices|
Another difference between the two earmuffs is the battery compartment. The Liberator HP 2.0 has a separate battery tray and uses CR123A batteries. In contrast, the Sordin Supreme Pro X earmuffs have AAA batteries and a variable power compartment with a speed-change cover. Some users may find one type of battery compartment easier to use.
Finally, the Sordin Supreme Pro X earmuffs are available with LED lights, while the Liberator HP 2.0 is not. This can be a valuable feature for those who need to see in low-light conditions.
The Safariland Liberator HP 2.0 earmuffs and the Sordin Supreme Pro X earmuffs are excellent options for electronic hearing protection. However, the choice between the two will primarily come down to individual user preferences and needs, such as the need for a helmet rail mount or LED lights, ease of battery replacement, and level of sound attenuation.
Safariland Liberator V Dual Comm Headset vs Sordin Supreme MIL CC Slim Headset
The Safariland Liberator V Dual Comm Headset and the Sordin Supreme MIL CC Slim Communication Headset are two earmuffs designed for tactical users. When comparing these two sets of earmuffs, it is vital to consider the following criteria.
Noise Reduction Rating
First, both earmuffs’ noise reduction rating (NRR) should be considered. The Safariland Liberator V has an NRR of 20, while the Sordin Supreme MIL CC Slim has an NRR of 20-23. Both earmuffs provide reasonable protection against loud noises.
Second, compatibility with communication devices should be considered. The Safariland Liberator V is a dual comm (two devices) headset that can be used with multiple headsets simultaneously. On the other hand, the Sordin Supreme MIL CC Slim is designed for use with a single communication device. Both earmuffs have communication capabilities, but the Safariland Liberator V may be more versatile in terms of compatibility.
Third, communication capabilities are essential. The Safariland Liberator V has a built-in microphone and speaker and is designed to run on two AAA or one CR123 battery. At the same time, the Sordin Supreme MIL CC Slim features a boom microphone and is powered by two AAA batteries. Both earmuffs have good communication capabilities, but the choice between the two will depend on personal preference.
Fourth, comfort is essential for tactical users who may be wearing earmuffs for extended periods. For example, the Safariland Liberator V has soft ear cushions and an adjustable headband for a comfortable fit. In contrast, the Sordin Supreme MIL CC Slim has a slim cup design for freedom of movement and a tight fit over the ears without compromising comfort. Both earmuffs provide good comfort, but the choice will depend on personal preference.
Finally, durability is a crucial consideration for tactical use. For example, the Safariland Liberator V is scratch-resistant and designed to withstand dust, moisture, and impact exposure. At the same time, the Sordin Supreme MIL CC Slim has been tested against military standards for environmental engineering and laboratory tests.
The Sordin Supreme MIL CC Slim Communication Headset boasts a high-temperature rating. In addition, it has been tested against relevant parts of the MIL-STD-810G and MIL-STD-810H standards for environmental engineering and laboratory tests. It also has an estimated battery runtime of 600 hours, almost double that of other brands.
The Safariland Liberator V Dual Comm Headset and the Sordin Supreme MIL CC Slim Communication Headset offer substantial noise reduction and compatibility with communication devices.
However, the Safariland Liberator V offers advanced features like dual fuel capability and audio profiles modifiable with simple keystrokes on the headset. At the same time, the Sordin Supreme MIL CC Slim has a high-temperature rating and an impressive battery runtime.
Regarding comfort, both earmuffs have soft ear cushions and an adjustable headband, so the choice ultimately depends on the user’s specific needs.
Finally, the Safariland Liberator V offers enhanced hearing protection and a scratch-resistant and slim earcup. At the same time, the Sordin Supreme MIL CC Slim has been tested against rigorous standards for environmental engineering and laboratory tests.
Sordin Supreme Pro vs Safariland Liberator
The Safariland Liberator V Dual Comm Headset and the Sordin Supreme MIL CC Slim Communication Headset offer excellent noise reduction and communication capabilities for tactical users.
The Safariland Liberator V stands out for its unique dual fuel feature, allowing it to run on either two AAA or one CR123 battery, and its compatibility with other headsets.
The Sordin Supreme Pro X offers a slim and comfortable design, exceptional durability, and a noise reduction rating of 20 dB.
Furthermore, the Safariland Liberator HP 2.0 and the Sordin Supreme MIL CC Slim are worth considering for their enhanced hearing protection and excellent communication capabilities.
Ultimately, the choice between these headsets comes from personal preference and the user’s needs. However, with all the features and benefits of these headsets, shooters and tactical users can rest assured that they will have reliable and effective hearing protection and communication in any situation.
So whether you’re heading out for a day at the range or preparing for a tactical operation, you can trust these top-of-the-line earmuffs’ quality and performance.
As they say, “When it comes to tactical communication headsets, it’s all about Safariland and Sordin Supreme Pro. Accept no substitutes!”